Legal Opinion

Zortman v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, defendant’s motion denied, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: The court erred in setting aside the verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendant. Plaintiff failed to plead or prove compliance with the written notice provision contained in the city charter (Niagara Falls City Charter, § 323-b), a condition precedent to bringing an action to recover for injuries incurred because of a defective or unsafe sidewalk. Additionally, plaintiff failed to establish that the *712condition of the sidewalk was caused by any affirmative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Shaw v. City of AuburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Shaw v. City of AuburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gallo v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Kaempf v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API