Zortman v. City of Niagara Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, defendant’s motion denied, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: The court erred in setting aside the verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendant. Plaintiff failed to plead or prove compliance with the written notice provision contained in the city charter (Niagara Falls City Charter, § 323-b), a condition precedent to bringing an action to recover for injuries incurred because of a defective or unsafe sidewalk. Additionally, plaintiff failed to establish that the *712condition of the sidewalk was caused by any affirmative…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Shaw v. City of AuburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shaw v. City of AuburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gallo v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kaempf v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991