Legal Opinion

New York v. Tanella

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 3, 2003No. 1:02-cv-01343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant Jude Ta-nella’s motion, pursuant Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he is immune from prosecution under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. For the reasons stated here, the motion to dismiss the indictment is granted.

I. FACTS 1

Jude Tanella is a special agent with the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”). At the time of the events giving rise to this case, he was assigned to Group D-24, New York Field Division, Drug…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of New York v. Jude TanellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Texas v. KleinertDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API