Legal Opinion
Anzaldo v. Social Security
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 20, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00196Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Myra A., Case No. 2:23-cv-00196-BNW 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 6 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES 7 Commissioner of Social Security, 8 Defendant. 9 10 This is an action for judicial review of the denial of social security benefits under 42 11 U.S.C. § 405(g). On March 15, 2024, this Court remanded this action for further proceedings. 12 ECF No. 26. Plaintiff’s attorney moves for an unopposed award of attorneys’ fees under the 13 Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) following Plaintiff’s successful motion for remand. ECF 14 No. 27. As…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Costa v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hardisty v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.