Legal Opinion

Pence v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1927No. 17710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The defendant, Will Pence, was convicted of perjury. He made a motion in arrest of judgment, and an amendment to it, *269alleging that the indictment and the verdict and sentence based thereon are void because the indictment “is fatally defective and void and charges no offense under the law,” and “does not specifically allege how and wherein the testimony upon which the perjury is assigned was material to the issue in the trial in which the alleged false testimony was delivered, neither does it allege what was the issue before the said justice court, nor how the same was raised, and that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API