Legal Opinion

Massimilian v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The question now before us is whether section 569-a of the Education Law (Laws of 1937, chap. 887) gives to the plaintiff or one similarly situated, a cause of action against the board of education or trustees of a school district, or whether such statute is intended to be a means of indemnification from personal financial loss of the negligent actor mentioned in section 569-a of the Education Law. Such section of the Education Law is as follows: “ Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law, general, special or local, or the limitation contained in the provisions of any *429city charter,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Derlicka v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Kosiba v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. HARE EX REL. HARE v. PennellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Sun Indemnity Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. St. Paul Insurance Companies v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Filippone v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Tripus v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API