Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Bouanchaud

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1924No. 26785Published

1Dissent

The relators in this case were defendants in an executory proceeding, and are plaintiffs in an injunction suit. In their petition for injunction they alleged (1) that the mortgage was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and (2) that they had a liquidated claim against the seizing creditor which would compensate or offset the latter's claim against them. They were therefore entitled to a writ of injunction, as a matter of absolute right, and without giving bond. Code of Prac. art. 739, Nos. 6 and 7; and article 740.

Justice ST. PAUL so ruled, in the original opinion which he handed down in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pelletier v. SommervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Franek v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Calhoun v. Mechanics' & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  4. Richardson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Latiolais v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API