Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. City of Paris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1933No. 4604PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

There is involved in the controversy the right of the appellants to have the relief allowed of an interlocutory order restraining 'public city officials from acts complained of in the certain matters of building a service station for motor vehicles and the pursuit of business therein on particular premises in the city of Paris. The appellants claim that the temporary restraining order should have been allowed, because the refusal of the city officials tb grant the permit to construct the filling station and pursue the business on the particular premises was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. McKelley v. City of MurfreesboroTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Hume v. ZuehlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Kimbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Williams v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Vireca Corporation v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API