Legal Opinion

State v. Skinner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1973No. 38530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The defendant was charged with assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury and with possession of a firearm by a felon. The jury found the defendant not guilty of assault but guilty on the second count. The defendant appeals, contending that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence and that section 28-1011.15, R. S. Supp., 1972, is invalid.

The record shows that on December 24, 1971, the defendant shot Charles F. Runninghawk, Jr., with a 4-inch, .22 automatic pistol. The record also shows that the defendant was convicted of a felony on August 11, 1965.

Over proper objection,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. BURTON v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. United States v. Dale Einar SynnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Crow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. McDonnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. State v. HaynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Masters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API