Legal Opinion

In re Benicar (Olmesartan) Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 3, 2015No. MDL No. 2606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.

Before the Panel: Plaintiff in an action {Johnson) pending in the Northern District of Ohio moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in that district. The litigation consists of the fifteen actions listed on Schedule A.1

All responding plaintiffs support centralization, although there is some disagreement concerning the choice of an appropriate transferee district. Most plaintiffs support selection of the Northern District of Ohio, but other plaintiffs suggest the Northern District of Alabama, the Central District of California, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  3. In re Fresenius Granuflo/naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API