Legal Opinion

Konvalin v. Tan Hai Ying

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*288OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles J. Markey, J.

Plaintiff John Konvalin, by order to show cause, requests this court to name a specific attorney, who shall be referred to simply as D.R. in the event this opinion is selected for publication, as receiver for the defendant. The law office of Norman Volk & Associates, PC., in Manhattan, represented the defendant in the underlying personal injury case. The successor counsel of Norman Volk & Associates, PC. is Baker, McEvoy, Morrisey & Maskovitz, located at 333 West 34th Street, New York, New York.

In 1998, the plaintiff retained counsel to represent him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vitale v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re GarganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. SiddenNew York Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Kaur v. American Transit InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API