Masino v. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 93, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiffs from order of C. P. Bucks Co., Nov. T., 1909, No. 6, refusing to take off non-suit in case of Anthony Masino et al. v. Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Mut. Ins. Assn, of Bucks County. Assumpsit upon a policy of fire insurance. Before Stout, P. J. At the trial the court entered a compulsory non-suit which it subsequently refused to take off. Error assigned, was refusal to take off non-suit
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The by-laws of the appellee were printed on and formed part of its policy of insurance held by the appellants. Article 19 provides: “In case of a loss or damage by fire to any property insured by this association, notice shall be given in writing, within thirty days *420to the president or secretary, who shall immediately appoint a committee from the board of managers, which committee shall examine and assess the whole amount of damage sustained, and report the same to the board of managers within two weeks from the time of receiving information of their appointment.” The notice…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Quiñones v. "L'Unión"Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1925
- Sucn. de Homar, Colom & Co., S. en C. v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928
- Quiñones v. L'UnionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1925
- Successors of Homar, Colom & Co. v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928