Legal Opinion
Rodakowski v. Budget Consultants, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
A judgment creditor sued a debt-consolidating agency and the debtor jointly to set aside an assignment of wages as a fraud. The creditor appeals from a decree dismissing her suit.
Under the agreement between the debtor and the agency, the debtor assigned all his wages, approximating some $550 each month, to the agency, and the agency agreed to return approximately $400 each month to the debtor “to live on.” The exact amount to be returned to the debtor was subject to the provision that the agency would keep “not less than” $150 each month to be distributed to various named creditors. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jolly v. KyleOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Leasure v. ForquerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Connel v. O'ConnorOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Lyons v. LeahyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Verex Assurance, Inc. v. John Hanson Savings and Loan, Inc., and Maduff & Sons, Inc., First Federal Savings and Loan Association, Verex Assurance, Inc. v. Maduff Mortgage Corporation v. John Hanson Savings & Loan Association First City Federal Savings and Loan Association, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Verex Assurance, Inc. v. John Hanson Savings & Loan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987