Commonwealth v. Bergdoll
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Mont* gomery Co., March T., 1913, No. 21, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Grover C. Bergdoll. Indictment for assault and battery. Before Swartz, P. J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty of assault.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Mont* gomery Co., March T., 1913, No. 21, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Grover C. Bergdoll. Indictment for assault and battery. Before Swartz, P. J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty of assault. On a rule for a new trial Swartz, P. J., filed the following opinion: The first count in the indictment charged an aggravated assault and battery, and the second count an assault and battery. The commonwealth went to trial on the count charging an aggravated assault and battery. It is alleged that,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
After due consideration we are all of opinion that the substantial questions raised by the assignments of error have been correctly and adequately answered in the opinion of the learned trial judge overruling the defendant’s motion‘for a new trial and in arrest of judgment.
The judgment is affirmed upon that opinion.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. ComberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.