Legal Opinion

Mable v. Bass Transportation Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 16, 1985No. 2764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal was taken from the judgment of the trial court striking the defendants’ third amended counterclaim. We find no error.

The action arises from an injury sustained by the plaintiff while working at Curtis Packaging Company in June, 1980. The plaintiff’s foot had been pinned between a metal plate on a loading dock and a dock wall at Curtis Packaging Company, by a tractor-trailer owned by the defendant, Bass Transportation Company, and driven by one of its employees. The plaintiff received workers’ compensation benefits from Curtis Packaging Company for his injuries.

The plaintiff then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Ribicoff v. Division of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Mable v. Bass Transportation Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
  4. Herold Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  2. Maccarone v. HawleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. Braun v. Valeur-Jensen, No. Cv97 0158163 S (Mar. 10, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API