Legal Opinion · Dissent

Evina v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1991No. Docket No. 120360Published

1DissentGriffin, P.J.

I respectfully dissent.

The investigation file at issue is a governmental file concerning a closed criminal investigation. As such, it is likely that the file is subject to disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, MCL 15.231 et seq.; MSA 4.1801(1) et seq.1 See Evening News Ass’n v City of Troy, 417 Mich 481; 339 NW2d 421 (1983), Haskins v Oronoko Twp Supervisor, 172 Mich App 73; 431 NW2d 210 (1983), and Post-Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc v Detroit, 179 Mich App 331; 445 NW2d 529 *103(1989). This alternative basis for affirmance, however, was neither resolved below nor adequately…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Evening News Ass'n v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Lindsay v. LipsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. J. A. Utley Co. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API