Legal Opinion

Kronsberg v. Mayer

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided November 1, 1890Published

Action by Frederick Kronsberg against Hugo F. Mayer for libel. A judgment by default had been reopened, and both parties had announced themselves ready for trial, when they settled the case, defendant stipulating to pay taxable costs. A trial fee was taxed, and defendant moves for a relaxation.

1Opinion of the CourtDugro, J.

It seems that this action was. upon the day calendar, and both sides ready, when it was discontinued by consent, upon defendant’s stipulating to pay taxable costs. It appears that the case was -not actually reached in its regular order. It had been called and passed, and could not, therefore, be moved for trial. Ho trial fee is therefore recoverable. Sutphen v. Lash, 10 Hun, 120; Ehlers v. Willis, 63 How. Pr. 341, are in point, but not Jones v. Case, 38 How. Pr. 349. The taxation is reversed as to the trial fee, and the motion to strike it out granted, with $10 costs.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. CaseNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Ehlers v. WillisNew York Marine Court · 1882