Legal Opinion

State v. McIntosh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1977No. KCD 29019PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWOFFORD, Chief Judge.

Following a jury trial the appellant (defendant) was convicted of Burglary in the Second Degree and Stealing and was sentenced to two (2) years on each charge, such sentences to run concurrently.

On this appeal the defendant seeks reversal upon only one point, namely, that the court erred in overruling his motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence for the reason that the evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of either burglary or stealing. The thrust of his argument in support of this point is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. FrancoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State v. SalleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. McIntosh v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. PickettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API