Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Audley Clarke Company
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of McNamara v. Leipzig (227 N. Y. 291); Matter of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. (229 N. Y. 97); Braxton v. Mendelson (233 N. Y. 122); Charles v. Barrett (233 N. Y. 127); Meade v. Motor Haulage Co., Inc. (233 N. Y. 527); Cattini v. American Railway Express Co. (234 N. Y. 585); Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co.,Inc. (245 N. Y. 66).
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Claim of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Irwin v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Martucci v. Eskay Coal & Fuel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939