Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Boyden
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiffs allege in their bill in equity that in September, 1925, they and the defendant O’Connor were seised as tenants in common of specified land in Brock-ton of a value in excess of $60,000. In September, 1925, a petition for partition was filed in the Probate Court for Plymouth County upon which after due proceedings a decree was entered to the effect that said real estate be sold at public auction for not less than $48,000 after giving public notice of the time and place of sale as directed, and the defendant Boyden was appointed commissioner to make such sale. Under warrant issued…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Farquhar v. New England Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Godfrey v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Allen v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Holmes v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDonald v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Homer v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Town of Salisbury v. Salisbury Water Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Milne v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Commissioner of Banks v. Highland Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.