Hollis v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The judgments under review are: (a) the order overruling the demurrers to an equitable petition; (b) the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial; and (c) the order denying the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
In their petition William A. Maxwell and Martha Maxwell Higley sought a decree declaring them to be the children of William L. and Mattie Maxwell by virtue of an alleged contract between their father, Ace Brown, and the Maxwells, entered into when they were two and six years of age respectively. It was alleged that in January,.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Ware v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- City of Atlanta v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Mangham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Chamblee v. WaymanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maxwell v. HollisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Stith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Maxwell v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962