Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1959No. 20593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

The judgments under review are: (a) the order overruling the demurrers to an equitable petition; (b) the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial; and (c) the order denying the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

In their petition William A. Maxwell and Martha Maxwell Higley sought a decree declaring them to be the children of William L. and Mattie Maxwell by virtue of an alleged contract between their father, Ace Brown, and the Maxwells, entered into when they were two and six years of age respectively. It was alleged that in January,.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Ware v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. City of Atlanta v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Mangham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Chamblee v. WaymanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. HollisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Stith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Maxwell v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API