Chesnut v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Abe Chesnut, plaintiff, brought an action against the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. R. Co., the defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by him as a result of a sunstroke while he was employed by the defendant as a sectionhand in repair of the defendant’s railroad tracks.
Plaintiff’s second amended complaint was based upon a liability under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act and as negligence, the first count alleges that it was the duty of the defendant to use reasonable care not to injure him and to protect him from injury; that on August 7,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Brant v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Huff v. I. C. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Guerierro v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Conboy v. CrofootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964