Legal Opinion · Dissent

De John v. New York State Athletic Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 1961Published

1Dissent

Valente, J. (dissenting).

We would hold that the State Athletic Commission was not impotent to impose sanctions on petitioners in the face of the finding, confirmed as well by the majority of the court, that petitioners’ activities “ are detrimental to the interests of boxing generally, and * * * detrimental to the public interest, convenience, and necessity ’ ’. The commission is vested with the widest powers of supervision and control of the sport of boxing and those who participate in it (State Athletic Commission Law [L. 1920, ch. 912, as amd.], § 1 et seq.). Under section 1 the commission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. D'Amato v. KrulewitchNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. New York Public Library v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Wallman v. New York State Athletic CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API