Whittington v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
In this appeal of a rape conviction Whittington argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based upon after-discovered evidence. We agree, concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Whittington’s motion for a new trial. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment, and *214remand the proceeding to the trial court for a new trial.
The victim, a twenty-one year old Army private stationed at Fort Lee, Virginia, testified that she went to a recruiting station in Petersburg, along with a male friend, in search of the U.S.O. Whittington, an army…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hines v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Odum v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- State v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Fout v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stewart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Mundy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Williams v. People's Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Pavlick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Lamm v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.