Legal Opinion
Levinson v. Second Judicial District Court of State of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1987No. 16502, 16503PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Per Curiam: 1
These petitions, seeking writs of mandamus or, alternatively, writs of prohibition, challenge an order of the district court refusing to quash service of process on petitioners Michael Levinson (Case No. 16502) and William Wister (Case No. 16503). Because these petitions challenge the same order of the district court and present similar arguments, we hereby consolidate them for disposition. See NRAP 3(b). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petitions.
According to the allegations set forth in the pleadings below, real party in interest Placer Development…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mouzavires v. BaxterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Arbella Mutual Insurance v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Sutton v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hoag v. Sweetwater InternationalDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1994
- CENTURY INTERN. MANAGEMENT v. GonzalezCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.