League of Women Voters v. Florida House of Representatives
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentCanady, J.
In this case, for the first time in the recorded history of our Republic, a court has ruled that state legislators are required to submit to interrogation in a civil case concerning their legislative activities. I dissent from this unprecedented decision — a decision which effectively abrogates the well-established common law legislative privilege and grievously violates the constitutional separation of powers. I would approve the First District Court of Appeal’s cogent decision.
I
The legislative privilege — which the majority reduces to a matter of judicial discretion — is firmly rooted in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. GillockSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.