Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barnhill v. Remington Oil & Gas Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 5, 2006No. 2006-C-0047Published

1Concurrence

CALOGERO,

Chief Justice assigning additional reasons for concurrence.

hi participated in the majority’s disposition of the above case, being of the view that it was error on the part of the two lower courts to grant the defendants’ exception of no cause of action. I venture to add in this concurring opinion a couple of brief comments, which may be helpful to the parties and the trial court in connection with the trial of this case.

I believe that it was the majority’s view, and it certainly is my own, that there were at least two problems with disposing of this case by the lower courts’ granting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carriere v. Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Motwani v. Fun Centers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Canco, Inc. v. Outdoor Systems AdvertisingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API