Legal Opinion

State v. Hagel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2006No. Z1354140; A130721PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for violating ORS 815.225(1)(b), which prohibits, among other things, the use of a horn on a vehicle for purposes other than to give a reasonable warning. 1 Defendant moved to dismiss the citation that charged him with violating ORS 815.225(1)(b), contending that the statute violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We conclude that the court erred in denying the motion; we therefore reverse defendant’s conviction.

We held in City of Eugene v. Powlowski, 116 Or App 186, 840 P2d 1322 (1992), that a city ordinance phrased identically…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Eugene v. PowlowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ImmeltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. ImmeltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API