Legal Opinion

Nabisco, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Nabisco, Inc. (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision to grant Ann Cummings’ (Claimant) fatal claim petition pursuant to Section 108(i) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2,1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 11 P.S. § 27.1(í l.1 The issue presented is whether the referee erred in accepting and relying on testimony offered by Claimant’s witnesses.

Decedent, Dale Cummings, was employed as a baker in Employer’s third-floor bake shop from 1955 until 1981. He died from malignant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. DOC SCI-Chester v. C. Faison (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. R.D. Anderson v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API