Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Lonzo Cantrell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1980No. 78-1750Published

1Opinion of the Court

612 F.2d 509

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Albert Lonzo CANTRELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-1750.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 13, 1979.

Decided Jan. 7, 1980.

Bruce C. Houdek of James, Odegard, Millert & Houdek, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant-appellant.

John Oliver Martin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (with James P. Buchele, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., on brief), Kansas City, Kan., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before McWILLIAMS, BARRETT and McKAY, Circuit Judges.

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

1

This case involves two loads of firearms sold to a government "sting" operation.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Barrett; Concurrence · McWILLIAMS.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Beacon Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. Donald F. Bettenhausen and Bernice A. BettenhausenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Francis B. Freeman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Charles Francis FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Douglas A. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API