Legal Opinion

Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 7, 2020No. 1:16-cv-06099Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: cence □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ DATE FILED: //7/Z.9 HEENA SHIM-LARKIN, Plaintiff, : AMENDED! -against- : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, 16-CV-6099 (AJN)(KNF) Defendant. : nner eee □□□ ener neenenee X KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Heena Shim-Larkin (“Shim-Larkin’’), who is proceeding pro se, made a motion dated February 23, 2019, pursuant to, infer alia, Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for spoliation sanctions to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marion S. Mishkin Law Office v. LopaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Luna v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API