Legal Opinion

Elek v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2083 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this workmen’s compensation appeal, the claimant1 questions a denial of attorney’s fees by the board,2 which reversed the referee because the board concluded that the employer’s3 contesting of the claim was reasonsable. The award itself is not at issue in this appeal.4

Attorney’s fees are awarded under Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act5 *301when a claimant prevails, unless the evidence supports a conclusion that the employer had a reasonable basis for contesting liability. Landis v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 43 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 491,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Landis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Gunther v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. McGowan v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API