Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Minneapolis General Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1906No. Nos. 14,555—(182)Published

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Dickinson, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. 3.

Action to recover damages on account of personal injuries sustained by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant in failing to re*330pair a loose tire on the wheel of a wagon which the plaintiff was required to use as the employee of the defendant. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,708, and the defendant appealed from on order denying its motion for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

It is practically conceded that on June 9, 1904, and'for some eight years prior thereto, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wexler v. SalisburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API