Legal Opinion

United States v. Cheryl Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2000No. 99-3680, 99-3681, 99-3682, 99-3683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Each of the appellants was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, see 18 U.S.C. § 371, at least four counts of filing, or causing to be filed, false Medicare claims, see 18 U.S.C. § 287, see also 18 U.S.C. § 2(a), and one count of mail fraud, see 18 U.S.C. § 1341. They now appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1

I

The conduct leading to the indictment arose out of the defendants’ employment with American X-Rays, Inc., which provided mobile X-ray services to nursing home patients in a number of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. Gregory Jacen SykesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Francis Mariani, Louis Fargnoli, Francis Mariani, and Daniel MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Delmer Porter, Kenneth A. Berdick, M.D. And Myron Teitelbaum, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Cheryl Peterson, United States of America v. Ruth Ferguson, United States of America v. Michael Falkner, United States of America v. Frank MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API