Legal Opinion · Dissent

Little Sky, Inc. v. Rybka

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 1, 2003No. A03A1223Published

1DissentPhipps, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the sellers of a business in this suit against the buyers for nonpayment of purchase-money promissory notes.

1. In Division 1 of its opinion, the majority, in reliance on Jernigan Auto Parts v. Commercial State Bank,6 concludes that the conduct of the buyers, Tresham and Zacharchuk, in making partial pay*750ments on the promissory notes constituted a waiver of any claim of fraud. I cannot agree, and I find Jernigan Auto Parts distinguishable.(a) In Jernigan Auto, the buyers of a business waived…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Lee v. O'QuinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Carpenter v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Conway v. RomarionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Nixon v. Sandy Springs Fitness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API