Little Sky, Inc. v. Rybka
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentPhipps, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the sellers of a business in this suit against the buyers for nonpayment of purchase-money promissory notes.
1. In Division 1 of its opinion, the majority, in reliance on Jernigan Auto Parts v. Commercial State Bank,6 concludes that the conduct of the buyers, Tresham and Zacharchuk, in making partial pay*750ments on the promissory notes constituted a waiver of any claim of fraud. I cannot agree, and I find Jernigan Auto Parts distinguishable.(a) In Jernigan Auto, the buyers of a business waived…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Lee v. O'QuinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Carpenter v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Conway v. RomarionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Nixon v. Sandy Springs Fitness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.