Legal Opinion

Solis v. Blank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1901No. Appeal, No. 33PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal, No. 33, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1899, No. 675, on bill in equity in case of Isaac N. Solis, Ancillary Receiver of the Order of United Friends, v. Hannah Blank, Sallie E. Hilt, Emma G. Grier, Rose M. Shaughnessy, Caroline Conroy, Fannie G. Haines, Sarah Jones, The Imperial Order of United Friends and the Third National Bank. Bill in equity for an injunction and for the appointment of an ancillary receiver.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 33, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1899, No. 675, on bill in equity in case of Isaac N. Solis, Ancillary Receiver of the Order of United Friends, v. Hannah Blank, Sallie E. Hilt, Emma G. Grier, Rose M. Shaughnessy, Caroline Conroy, Fannie G. Haines, Sarah Jones, The Imperial Order of United Friends and the Third National Bank. Bill in equity for an injunction and for the appointment of an ancillary receiver. Sulzberger, J., filed the following adjudication: This cause came on for trial on November 20, 1899, and was duly heard on…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

We affirm the decree in this case on the very clear and satisfactory opinion of Judge Sulzbeegee.

Decree affirmed.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. BroadrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Frowert v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Nazareth Cement Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Smith v. Electric MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Bensinger v. Palo Alto School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API