Gram v. Acands, Inc.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant Keene Corporation’s contentions, we conclude that plaintiff Borucki presented evidence sufficient to support the jury’s verdict that her decedent was partially disabled from an asbestos-related condition at the time it was diagnosed that he was suffering from lung cancer and that the trial court adequately instructed the jury on the issue of proximate cause.

The allegedly improper summation comments of plaintiffs’ *902counsel do not require reversal. Defendant Keene did not object to several of the alleged…