Mrs. Ina Hemming, Cliff W. Hemming, Jr., Julia Ann Hemming, and Mrs. Alana Maude Hemming (Wuestefeld) v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company of New York

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Huth v. Southern Pacific Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I; Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

In this diversity action the appellants, named as beneficiaries in a certificate issued in connection with a group life insurance policy written by the appellee, sued on the policy, seeking a re-, covery…