Legal Opinion

Weinfurter v. Cresap

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 1924No. 24261PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

The Phil P. Cresap Company, Limited, executed a promissory note for *684$1,500 in favor of the Interstate Trust & Banking Company of New Orleans. Plaintiff was an indorser on this note, and as such was forced to pay, soon after the note matured, a balance of $1,325 due thereon. Plaintiff then sued the Phil P. Cresap Company, Limited, for the amount he had to pay, and obtained judgment against the company accordingly, with 8 per cent, per annum interest from May 29, 1916. The principal of this judgment was later reduced to $1,274.65.

In May, 1918, plaintiff instituted the present suit against E. O.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loeb v. ArentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Zuberbier v. MorseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  3. Courtney v. RigmaidenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Flanagan v. GehrkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Moore v. RinguetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Holland v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Giacona v. JulianiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Gast v. GastLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Holland v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API