Weinfurter v. Cresap
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
The Phil P. Cresap Company, Limited, executed a promissory note for *684$1,500 in favor of the Interstate Trust & Banking Company of New Orleans. Plaintiff was an indorser on this note, and as such was forced to pay, soon after the note matured, a balance of $1,325 due thereon. Plaintiff then sued the Phil P. Cresap Company, Limited, for the amount he had to pay, and obtained judgment against the company accordingly, with 8 per cent, per annum interest from May 29, 1916. The principal of this judgment was later reduced to $1,274.65.
In May, 1918, plaintiff instituted the present suit against E. O.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loeb v. ArentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Zuberbier v. MorseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Courtney v. RigmaidenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Flanagan v. GehrkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Moore v. RinguetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Holland v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Giacona v. JulianiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Gast v. GastLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Holland v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939