Legal Opinion
Lovgren v. Byrne
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 26, 1986No. 85-5180PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.
Gosta Lovgren and Lovgren Enterprises (“Lovgren”) were found by an administrative law judge to have violated two regulations issued pursuant to the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. (“The Magnuson Act”) and fined $50,000. The district court denied relief and Lovgren appealed to this court. We affirm.
I
On March 24, 1983, while thq. LYDIA J, a fishing boat, was unloading its catch at a dock owned by Lovgren Enterprises, agents of the National Marine Fisheries Service arrived at Lovgren’s dock for the purpose of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Fisheries Institute, Inc. v. MosbacherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Parravano v. BabbittDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Ace Lobster Co., Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
- FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hall v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.