Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 25, 2008No. 2008AP778-CRPublished

1DissentKessler, J.

¶ 24. (dissenting). I agree with the majority's implicit conclusion that the additional condition of extended supervision imposed by the reconfinement court was reasonable and appropriate. I disagree, however, that the plain language of the applicable statutes and applicable case law authorizes a reconfinement court to impose new conditions of extended supervision.

¶ 25. The only statute by which the legislature specifically authorized a court to impose conditions of extended supervision is Wis. Stat. § 973.01(5).1 These conditions are imposed at sentencing. The statute governing extended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API