Legal Opinion
State v. Kevin Donald Cheatham
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 2016No. 43263PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRATTON, Judge.
Kevin Donald Cheatham appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to amend judgment. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The State charged Cheatham -with grand theft by possession of stolen property, Idaho Code § 18-2403(4). Cheatham pled guilty, and the district court suspended his sentence in favor of two years of probation.
One of Cheatham’s probation conditions stated, “The defendant shall not reside in any location that contains firearms unless the firearms are secured and this portion of the rule is exempted in writing by the district manager.”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BrauchIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DoyleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. RamirezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021