Goodyear v. Cary
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In equity. This was a motion for a provisional injunction to restrain the defendants [William H. Cary and others] from infringing upon letters patent [No. 3,633] for “improvements in the manufacture of India-rubber” granted to Charles Goodyear June 15, 1844, reissued December 25, 1S49 [No. 156], and extended for seven years from June 15, 1858, in so far as said letters patent covered the manufacture of shirred, corrugated or elastic rubber goods, the exclusive right of…
Read the full summary
In equity. This was a motion for a provisional injunction to restrain the defendants [William H. Cary and others] from infringing upon letters patent [No. 3,633] for “improvements in the manufacture of India-rubber” granted to Charles Goodyear June 15, 1844, reissued December 25, 1S49 [No. 156], and extended for seven years from June 15, 1858, in so far as said letters patent covered the manufacture of shirred, corrugated or elastic rubber goods, the exclusive right of making and vending which, it was insisted by complainants Day and Hay, had been granted to them, by Charles Goodyear, by a…
1Opinion of the Court
INGERSOLL, District Judge.
The first of the original deeds containing the grants of right,- was executed by Goodyear and Day, on the 29th of October, 1846; another, called “Articles Additional or Supplemental” to those contained in the first-mentioned deed, was executed on the 5th of November of the same year; another, a “Memorandum of Agreement,” auxiliary to the last-mentioned deeds, was executed on the same 5th of November; another was executed on the 5th of December of the same year; and another on the 24th of May, 1858.
The first question to which attention must be directed is — what did…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Croasdale v. Court of Quarter SessionsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916