Legal Opinion

Delmar INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1987No. 86-1705PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment to the Secretary. The order had the effect of upholding a decision of the Secretary denying plaintiff’s request to re-open an earlier application, in order to extend the period over which benefits awarded him on his later application would be given retroactive effect.

The Supreme Court has noted that federal courts are without jurisdiction to review a decision of the Secretary refusing to reopen previously adjudicated claims, at least in the absence of a constitutional challenge. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. William F. Gosnell v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Bowens v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Glazer v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Suciu v. BarnhartDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
  5. Acker v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API