Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1982No. 2329PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue presented by this Commonwealth appeal is whether the entry of a guilty plea can be equated with commencement of trial for Rule 1100 purposes. We hold that the tendering of a guilty plea by an accused signifies the commencement of trial regardless of whether that plea is accepted immediately by the trial court or is taken under advisement. In so holding, we expressly overrule the earlier ruling of a panel of this Court in Commonwealth v. Cox, 276 Pa.Superior Ct. 29, 419 A.2d 78 (1980) (Watkins, J., dissenting).

The facts pertinent to the instant case are as follows. On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. West v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. JenschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. WhittallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API