Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Sotheby's, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 25, 2001No. 00 C 1590Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

David Nelson and Richard Price, 1 both citizens of Illinois, originally filed an action for conversion of a painting that Mr. Nelson gave to Sotheby’s, Inc. (“Sotheby’s”), a New York corporation, for appraisal in 1988. Sotheby’s did not return the painting until March 2000. I dismissed the conversion claim as barred by the statute of limitations, but granted the plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint. See Nelson v. Sotheby’s Inc., 115 F.Supp.2d 925 (N.D.Ill.2000). Sotheby’s now moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Peter G. Kohler and Walter J. Kohler v. Leslie Hindman, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, and Richard M. ThuneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Janke Construction Company, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Johnstowne Centre Partnership v. ChinIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dawn Equipment Company, Plaintiff-Counterclaim and James H. Bassett, Counterclaim v. Micro-Trak Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API