Legal Opinion

Christopher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 22, 1989No. 05-88-00974-CRPublished

1Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF DECISION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2DissentHowell, Justice

(Sept. 14, 1989)

I dissent from the consideration of this motion for rehearing. Our jurisdiction was concluded by the filing of the State’s petition for discretionary review on June 10, 1989. Alternatively, our jurisdiction was concluded fifteen days thereafter. Even if Tex.R.App.P. 101 be read to its most expansive limits, we have no jurisdiction to consider this motion for rehearing.

Compare: Ratcliff v. National County Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 745 S.W.2d 75 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1988, writ dism’d w.o.j.) (on…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ratcliff v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. WADSWORTH BUSINESS CENTER-WILLOWBROOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Connell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API