Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Chicago Board of Trade

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1903No. Gen. No. 11,025PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding for injunction to restrain the removal of telegraph tickers, etc. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ball

Appellant had no contract with the telegraph company which entitled him to receive from it continuous quotations of the Board of Trade prices. The contract the company had with Howland was a personal one, which he could not assign without its consent. By the act of selling out his business Howland put an end to that contract. Having no contractual relations with appellant, the company had the right, at any time after his purchase of the interest of How-land, to disconnect its wires and to cease to furnish to him such quotations. That it did so gave appellant no just cause of complaint.

By…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Comstock v. HenneberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Kilgrow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Baird v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API