Legal Opinion
Case v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided August 5, 1915No. 9PublishedCited by 6 opinions
At Law. Action by Mrs. G. E. Case, as administratrix, against the Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Company and the Southern Railway Company. On motion to remand to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a motion to remand the above cause to the state court. The following are the facts:
The plaintiff began her action in the court of common pleas for Spartanburg county against the defendant Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Company for damages on account of the death of her intestate. It was alleged in the complaint:
“That the defendant, Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Company, is now, and was at the time hereinafter set forth, a corporation duly created and organized under the laws of the state of South Carolina, and at said time, and now, owns a railroad…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Muller v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Goodwin v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
- Smith v. New York, N. H. & H. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gavin v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Knoblock v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. Emma v. Hudson & Manhattan R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Town of Bethel v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Starke v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Williams v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1954
- Gavin v. Hudson & Manhattan R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.