Schmidt v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
The primary issue in this case concerns appellate jurisdiction of orders under the Family Violence Act. We now hold that orders entered under the Family Violence Act must come by discretionary application and that jurisdiction lies in the Court of Appeals of Georgia. For reasons, of judicial economy, we address the merits and reverse the finding of contempt against Bradley Jay Schmidt because the trial court imposed criminal sanctions using a civil standard of proof.
1. Mr. Schmidt filed a direct appeal after being found in contempt of an order entered in a family…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rebich v. MilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- In Re CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Ensley v. EnsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Collins v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Hughes v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Gilliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Voyles v. VoylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Callaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Aaron Mason v. Cicely MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.