Legal Opinion

Rice v. . Postal Telegraph-Cable Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 15, 1916, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint which alleged that on March 20, 1913, Charles Rice, while in the employ of the defendant and as a result of its negligence, was killed in the city of Rochester by taking hold of a wire which was in contact with a high voltage wire of the…

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 15, 1916, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint which alleged that on March 20, 1913, Charles Rice, while in the employ of the defendant and as a result of its negligence, was killed in the city of Rochester by taking hold of a wire which was in contact with a high voltage wire of the Rochester Railway and Light Company; that the decedent left his father, the plaintiff in this action, as his sole next of…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; first and third questions certified answered in the affirmative; second question in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Ouddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stutz v. Guardian Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. Edwards v. SullivanNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re FahysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  4. Davis v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Baer v. BroderNew York Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API